Petr Brunclik vs Aslan Karatsev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

The upcoming tennis match between Karatsev and Brunclik promises to be closely contested, with each player having unique strengths that might determine the outcome. Examining their second serve performance over the last six months reveals that Karatsev has slightly outperformed Brunclik, with a respective success rate of 44.78% compared to 43.71%. This statistic often correlates highly with match prediction accuracy.

Looking at return game statistics, Karatsev has a marginal advantage in winning points on opponents' second serves, boasting a 47.41% success rate against Brunclik's 47.2%. However, Brunclik outshines Karatsev on first-serve returns, achieving a rate of 29.32%, while Karatsev stands at 24.61%. Such figures often play a pivotal role in head-to-head predictions between players.

When under pressure, Brunclik has demonstrated the ability to save breakpoints more effectively, with a save percentage of 57.8% against Karatsev’s 49.72%. Considering break point conversion, Karatsev has successfully converted 36.63% of his breakpoint opportunities, whereas Brunclik has converted only 25.66%. These statistics can be invaluable for those interested in in-game betting predictions.

A performance overview of the past year reveals contrasting win-loss records, with Karatsev achieving a 53.06% match win rate (W/L 26/23) compared to Brunclik's higher 60.98% (W/L 25/16). Surface preferences further differentiate the two, with Karatsev excelling on hard courts (63% win rate) and Brunclik performing even better, holding a 73% win rate on hard surfaces. Conversely, both players have distinctly weaker performances on their least favorite surfaces: Karatsev on grass with a 29% win rate and Brunclik on indoor hard courts with a 44% win rate.

The level and quality of opponents each player has faced might significantly impact the dynamics of this match. Over the past 12 months, Karatsev has contended against opponents with an average ranking of 206.84, while Brunclik has faced players with a stronger average rank of 147.32. This difference in opponent quality might provide an edge to Brunclik, given his experience against tougher competition.

Additionally, Karatsev’s experience in the Challengers/ITF sphere, where he has won 66.67% of his matches (W/L 18/9), contrasts with Brunclik’s dominant play in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, achieving a 59.46% win rate (W/L 22/15). Although both have a 40% success rate in deciding sets over the past year, the level at which these sets were played might be a determining factor.

In reviewing all available data, although Karatsev shows some statistical advantages, Brunclik's superior win-loss record, coupled with his stronger opponent encounters, suggest he might have the upper hand. Taking all factors into consideration, Brunclik is poised to possibly emerge victorious in this matchup.